- From: Thiago Perrotta <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 02:45:42 -0800
- To: w3c/permissions <permissions@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 21 November 2023 10:45:47 UTC
@thiagowfx commented on this pull request.
> + </section>
+ <section>
+ <h5 id="extension-module-permissions-types">
+ Types
+ </h5>
+ <section>
+ <h6 id="extension-module-type-permissions-PermissionDescriptor">
+ The permissions.PermissionDescriptor Type
+ </h6>
+ <pre class="cddl local-cddl">
+ permissions.PermissionDescriptor = {
+ name: text,
+ }
+ </pre>
+ <p>
+ The <code>permissions.PermissionDescriptor</code> type represents a {{PermissionDescriptor}}.
In theory, `<code>` and backticks are synonyms. I chose `<code>` to mirror the style of the BiDi spec.
In this case, I'll replace all `<code>` occurrences with backticks. Should I also replace the occurrences that this PR did not touch? (fine by me)
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/permissions/pull/425#discussion_r1400384286
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <w3c/permissions/pull/425/review/1741674807@github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 21 November 2023 10:45:47 UTC