- From: jgraham <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 00:56:49 -0800
- To: w3c/permissions <permissions@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 16 November 2023 08:56:55 UTC
@jgraham commented on this pull request. > </p> + <section> + <h4 id="extension-module-browser"> + The browser Module + </h4> + <p> + The [=modules/browser=] module contains commands for There is no "colon requirement". Note that paragraph starts "An _implementation_ may…". This specification is not an implementation, so it doesn't apply. However the BiDi spec currently doesn't talk about external specifications at all (and presumably couldn't do so in a binding way). However if it did, it would express the preference that third party specifications add additional modules where possible rather than adding to existing commands, events or modules, just so that it's clear what the total definition of each module is. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/permissions/pull/425#discussion_r1395359488 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3c/permissions/pull/425/review/1733842937@github.com>
Received on Thursday, 16 November 2023 08:56:55 UTC