- From: Nolan Lawson <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2023 08:03:38 -0800
- To: WICG/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Saturday, 11 November 2023 16:03:43 UTC
Two arguments I keep seeing pop up in this thread: 1. This feature is desperately needed. 2. This feature is not polyfillable. The second statement is mostly false, as demonstrated by @Danny-Engelman's examples as well as [the proof-of-concept I published to npm](https://www.npmjs.com/package/open-stylable). (I say "mostly" because descendant selectors and `:has()` can't traverse shadow boundaries. Although it's not even clear that a real browser implementation would solve that, [based on Ryosuke's comment above](https://github.com/WICG/webcomponents/issues/909#issuecomment-742851382)). I'll also note that my polyfill currently has ~1 weekly download, and I don't see any other polyfills on npm. If web developers were clamoring for this feature, you'd think that there would be a lot more interest in polyfills. This makes me question both of the above arguments. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/WICG/webcomponents/issues/909#issuecomment-1806852528 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <WICG/webcomponents/issues/909/1806852528@github.com>
Received on Saturday, 11 November 2023 16:03:43 UTC