- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2023 01:40:53 -0800
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 8 November 2023 09:40:59 UTC
I thought this capability was going to be more powerful than `keepalive`, but maybe that is not the case? What exactly are we providing that websites cannot do today? It was with the understanding that it was going to be more powerful that the idea came up that it perhaps should be constrained in some manner. Also, `keepalive` was added in 2016, before widespread acknowledgment that we need to partition state and perhaps restrict cross-site documents in certain manners. So even if this is strictly as capable as `keepalive` we will need to consider if the existing `keepalive` non-restrictions still make sense. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/1715#issuecomment-1801429612 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <whatwg/fetch/issues/1715/1801429612@github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 8 November 2023 09:40:59 UTC