[w3ctag/design-reviews] Display and content-visibility animations (Issue #824)

こんにちは TAG-さん!

I'm requesting a TAG review of Display and content-visibility animations.

Support specifying display and content-visibility in animations. This support allows for developers to create exit animations after which the element automatically becomes display: none or content-visibility: hidden without needing to write any javascript to handle that switch after the animation is finished. This allows exit animations for elements to be added purely in CSS.

  - Explainer¹ (minimally containing user needs and example code): https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6429#issuecomment-1318933547
  - Specification URL: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-display-4/#display-animation
  - Tests:
    - https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-display/animations/display-interpolation.tentative.html
    - https://wpt.fyi/results/web-animations/animation-model/animation-types/display.tentative.html
  - User research: none
  - Security and Privacy self-review²: none, I believe this animations feature has no security/privacy implications.
  - GitHub repo (if you prefer feedback filed there): none
  - Primary contacts (and their relationship to the specification):
      - Joey Arhar @josepharhar Google
      - Robert Flack @flackr Google
  - Organization(s)/project(s) driving the specification: Google
  - Key pieces of existing multi-stakeholder review or discussion of this specification: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6429
  - External status/issue trackers for this specification (publicly visible, e.g. Chrome Status): https://chromestatus.com/feature/5154958272364544

Further details:

  - [x] I have reviewed the TAG's [Web Platform Design Principles](https://www.w3.org/TR/design-principles/)
  - Relevant time constraints or deadlines: We are trying to ship this in Chrome 114 which branches on April 20th and goes to stable on May 30th
  - The group where the work on this specification is currently being done: CSSWG
  - The group where standardization of this work is intended to be done (if current group is a community group or other incubation venue): CSSWG
  - Major unresolved issues with or opposition to this specification: none
  - This work is being funded by: Google

We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as (please delete all but the desired option):

  💬 leave review feedback as a **comment in this issue** and @-notify [github usernames]

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/824
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/824@github.com>