Re: [whatwg/dom] Rename Range's 'start' and 'end' to 'range start' and 'range end'. (PR #1168)

> Fields shouldn't contain the name of the concept they belong to.

I don't think this is at all universal - we *often* put the parent term into sub-definitions, for readability. We'll often put in a local-lt without the prefix, so it's not too repetitious in the spec itself, which is most likely to say it a bunch and have the context already, but that's it.

> I would be glad to have CSS configured to prefer its own terms internally somehow if that's possible; @tabatkins is that possible? (Splitting into modules is useful to us in a lot of ways but it definitely makes cross-linking more of a mess.)

It's not currently possible; it would require some categorization and logic that does not exist currently. Probably something I want eventually, but still needs a lot of thought to make it more than just "something for the CSSWG to use".

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/dom/pull/1168#issuecomment-1460982878
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/dom/pull/1168/c1460982878@github.com>