Re: [whatwg/url] URL.canParse() (Issue #713)

I'm not convinced that `canParse()` is the check that the people using those libraries really want. For example, we can parse `a::<!>::` as a URL, but you probably wouldn't want to accept that in an input field.

In the absence of benchmarks I'm also not convinced by the performance argument.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/url/issues/713#issuecomment-1455534717
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/url/issues/713/1455534717@github.com>