Re: [whatwg/fetch] HTTPS upgrades proposal (PR #1655)

@meacer commented on this pull request.



> +      <li><p><var>request</var>'s <a for="request">destination</a> is "<code>document</code>"
+
+      <li><p><var>request</var>'s <a for="request">method</a> is not "<code>GET</code>"
+
+      <li><p><var>request</var>'s <a for="request">URL</a>'s <a for=url>scheme</a> is not
+      "<code>http</code>"
+
+      <li><p><var>request</var>'s <a for="request">URL</a>'s <a for=url>host</a> is exempted from
+      upgrades in an <a>implementation-defined</a> way. For example, if <a for=url>host</a> is a
+      non-registrable or non-assignable domain name such as .local or an IP address that falls in a
+      range reserved for non-publicly routable networks, the implementation might return without
+      modifying <var>request</var>.
+    </ul>
+  </li>
+
+  <li><p>If <var>request</var>'s <code>https-upgrade-fallback-url</code> is non-null, this is a

Done

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/1655#discussion_r1247257190
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/fetch/pull/1655/review/1506251307@github.com>