- From: Tim Nguyen <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 14:48:36 -0700
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 22 June 2023 21:48:42 UTC
I think one question I'd be interested in seeing answered regarding this new feature is why: ``` dialog { @starting-style { opacity: 0; } transition: opacity 0.4s; } ``` is preferable over: ``` @keyframes fade-in { 0% { opacity: 0 } } dialog { animation: fade-in 0.4s; } ``` They both work and achieve the same use case, and the new syntax isn't that much shorter. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/829#issuecomment-1603357680 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/829/1603357680@github.com>
Received on Thursday, 22 June 2023 21:48:42 UTC