- From: natechapin <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 08:55:48 -0700
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/867@github.com>
こんにちは TAG-さん!
I'm requesting a TAG review of navigateEvent.sourceElement.
This is a small extension of the [navigation API](https://github.com/WICG/navigation-api), which was previously reviewed in https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/605 and https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/717. The navigateEvent exposes many details about a navigation that has just begun, and we wish to add a `sourceElement` attribute: the `Element` that initiated the navigation (if any).
- Explainer¹ (minimally containing user needs and example code): https://github.com/WICG/navigation-api/pull/264
- User research: Requested and discussed on our issue tracker: https://github.com/WICG/navigation-api/issues/225
- Security and Privacy self-review²: None - this shouldn't expose anything that isn't already available
- GitHub repo (if you prefer feedback filed there): https://github.com/WICG/navigation-api/
- Primary contacts (and their relationship to the specification):
- Nate Chapin (@natechapin), Google
- Domenic Denicola (@domenic), Google
- Organization/project driving the design: Google
- External status/issue trackers for this feature (publicly visible, e.g. Chrome Status): None yet.
Further details:
- [x] I have reviewed the TAG's [Web Platform Design Principles](https://www.w3.org/TR/design-principles/)
- The group where the incubation/design work on this is being done (or is intended to be done in the future): WICG
- The group where standardization of this work is intended to be done ("unknown" if not known): WHATWG
- Existing major pieces of multi-stakeholder review or discussion of this design: https://github.com/WICG/navigation-api/issues/225
- Major unresolved issues with or opposition to this design: None yet. The main point of debate has been the name. I am happy to consider alternatives to `sourceElement`.
- This work is being funded by: Google
We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as (please delete all but the desired option):
💬 leave review feedback as a **comment in this issue** and @-notify [@natechapin, @domenic]
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/867
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/867@github.com>
Received on Thursday, 22 June 2023 15:55:53 UTC