- From: Chris Harrelson <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 14:39:59 -0700
- To: w3c/editing <editing@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 20 June 2023 21:40:06 UTC
> 1. The specification needs to be web compatible for it to be useful. Any changes to existing behavior of implementations need very good justification. Probably a higher bar than we employ elsewhere. > 2. The specification needs to allow implementations to follow platform-specific conventions where applicable. I think these two points Anne mentioned make sense from a Chrome/Chromium perspective as well. I'd also like to note that: * In practice item 1 will tend to result in choosing existing Blink/WebKit behavior if it's shared by those implementations. * My research so far leads me to conclude that not many libraries or sites use `execCommand` very much (but still a substantial enough number to be worried about web compat), which is another reason to be conservative about accepting normative changes. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/editing/issues/432#issuecomment-1599599667 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3c/editing/issues/432/1599599667@github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 20 June 2023 21:40:06 UTC