[w3ctag/design-reviews] ServiceWorker static routing API (Issue #863)

こんにちは TAG-さん!

I'm requesting a TAG review of ServiceWorker static routing API.

This API allows developers to configure the routing, and allows them to offload simple things ServiceWorkers do. If the condition matches, the navigation happens without starting ServiceWorkers or executing JavaScript, which allows web pages to avoid performance penalties due to ServiceWorker interceptions.

  - Explainer¹ (minimally containing user needs and example code): [url](https://github.com/yoshisatoyanagisawa/service-worker-static-routing-api)
  - User research: it is a well-studied phenomenon that faster sites are better for users, but we have not conducted any user studies specifically on this feature.
  - Security and Privacy self-review²: [url](https://github.com/yoshisatoyanagisawa/service-worker-static-routing-api/blob/main/security-privacy-questionnaire.md)
  - GitHub repo (if you prefer feedback filed there): [url](https://github.com/yoshisatoyanagisawa/service-worker-static-routing-api) ([proposed](https://github.com/WICG/proposals/issues/102) to move to WICG)
  - Primary contacts (and their relationship to the specification):
      - Yoshisato Yanagisawa (@yoshisatoyanagisawa), Google
      - Shunya Shishido (@sisidovski), Google
  - Organization/project driving the design: Google Chrome
  - External status/issue trackers for this feature (publicly visible, e.g. Chrome Status):
      - [ChromeStatus](https://chromestatus.com/feature/5185352976826368)
      - [Mozilla standards position](https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/828)

Further details:

  - [x] I have reviewed the TAG's [Web Platform Design Principles](https://www.w3.org/TR/design-principles/)
  - The group where the incubation/design work on this is being done (or is intended to be done in the future): W3C Service Workers Working Group
  - The group where standardization of this work is intended to be done ("unknown" if not known): W3C Service Workers Working Group
  - Existing major pieces of multi-stakeholder review or discussion of this design: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1373
  - Major unresolved issues with or opposition to this design: Maybe no as far as I took a glance at https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1373
  - This work is being funded by: Google

You should also know that...

We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as (please delete all but the desired option):

  🐛 open issues in our GitHub repo for **each point of feedback**


-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/863
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/863@github.com>