Re: [whatwg/fetch] Deferred fetching (PR #1647)

@noamr commented on this pull request.



> @@ -8449,6 +8597,60 @@ with a <var>promise</var>, <var>request</var>, <var>responseObject</var>, and an
 </div>
 
 
+<h3 id=fetch-later-method>FetchLater method</h3>
+
+<pre class=idl>
+
+dictionary DeferredRequestInit : RequestInit {
+  DOMHighResTimeStamp backgroundTimeout;
+};
+
+partial interface mixin WindowOrWorkerGlobalScope {
+  [NewObject] Promise&lt;Response> fetchLater(RequestInfo input, optional DeferredRequestInit init = {});

In second look I think @fergald is right... A boolean should be enough.
@annevk what is the use case for the promise? Perhaps we can defer that for later and have it be:

```webidl
interface FetchLaterState {
  readonly attribute boolean sent;
}
```

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/1647#discussion_r1221827898
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/fetch/pull/1647/review/1468040320@github.com>