- From: Michael McCool <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2023 04:56:10 -0700
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 7 June 2023 11:56:16 UTC
Sorry for the late response on this, since we decided not to try and push Profiles through in this charter (ending in a month) our focus has been on the three other WoT documents entering PR. However, Profiles are included in our next draft charter and it would be a good time to gather input on them. Are your constraints on a meeting time the same? I will check with others involved in Profiles about whether the Monday slot works. As for Matter, what Ben said. My company is a member of the consortium and I have worked with Matter a fair bit. While technically the standard solves several problems related to security and performance, it's not going to magically replace all the existing standards overnight, nor is is completely suitable for all use cases, being mostly focused on Smart Home. The statements they make about it solving problems of interoperability are mostly in that specific context and based on assumptions about wide adoption there. My expectations is that Matter will slowly gain traction but that IoT will continue to use a variety of standards and WoT will remain relevant. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/818#issuecomment-1580652748 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/818/1580652748@github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 7 June 2023 11:56:16 UTC