- From: Chris Lilley <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2023 09:15:51 -0700
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 5 June 2023 16:15:56 UTC
@mnot wrote: > there was a fair amount of negative feedback from HTTP folks on this specfication Did you see that there is an [explainer](https://github.com/w3c/IFT/blob/main/Patch-Subset-Explainer.md) and that, in the Detailed Design Discussion section, two of the three sub-sections relate to the HTTP WG feedback? (The rest, as @garretrieger mentioned, relates to the Range Request specification, which is not part of this TAG review) -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/849#issuecomment-1577094120 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/849/1577094120@github.com>
Received on Monday, 5 June 2023 16:15:56 UTC