Re: [whatwg/streams] Should the underlying source be pinged for cancel when a close request exists? (Issue #1252) from Adam Rice on 2023-01-24 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from January 2023)

From: Adam Rice <notifications@github.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 23:31:29 -0800
To: whatwg/streams <streams@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <whatwg/streams/issues/1252/1401494970@github.com>

My interpretation is that in the second case, all the data has been read, so the underlying source doesn't need to know about the cancellation. But in the first case there's potentially been some data loss.

It's probably too late to change the behaviour given how much code has been written against the current semantics.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/1252#issuecomment-1401494970
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/streams/issues/1252/1401494970@github.com>

Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2023 07:31:42 UTC