Re: [whatwg/fetch] String representations for Fetch API objects (Issue #1575)

@domfarolino I see. thank you for the references, I'll take a look. 

What about a custom `[Symbol.*]` which provides a function tailored to emit a better console representation? I understand stringification is already a point of API compatibility, so surely an opt-in upgrade for implementers would be best if this is fixed by spec.

> Feel free to file a bug on Console for this, but I will say that standard doesn't get a whole lot of love these days so any large contributions are more likely to materialize with help from the community!

Forgive me, I'm new to standards contribution :) I would love to file a contribution for this if it is a welcome PR from WhatWG's perspective. How do I get started? I'll take a look at that spec, contribution guides, etc. Would I just fork, and file a PR change to the spec itself?

I happen to be _implementing_ the Fetch API in a [different project entirely](https://alpha.elide.dev/) which involves a JS runtime, so I have an opportunity to dogfood those new Console extensions myself and iterate quickly if that is at all helpful.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/1575#issuecomment-1401158918
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/fetch/issues/1575/1401158918@github.com>

Received on Monday, 23 January 2023 23:45:40 UTC