- From: Robin Berjon <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2023 10:45:07 -0800
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Saturday, 14 January 2023 18:45:21 UTC
Quick question: according to [this statement](https://twitter.com/larakiara/status/1613951009524699136?t=8EdlrLu5k4eq3EGh8_A-pA&s=19) and to the [following thread](https://twitter.com/vkw/status/1614001374873944066?t=6ajJeK2z7oogg_kI-tUW8g&s=19), Google believe that they have further arguments relating to Topics that have not been taken into consideration by the TAG. Is the expectation that these arguments will be brought here so that the TAG may review them? What's more if the TAG still finds Topics problematic after these arguments are brought forth, is the plan to withdraw the proposal, or to ship no matter what? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/726#issuecomment-1382885996 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/726/1382885996@github.com>
Received on Saturday, 14 January 2023 18:45:21 UTC