- From: Andy Earnshaw <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 05:44:22 -0800
- To: WICG/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 12 January 2023 13:44:34 UTC
@abitrolly, I'm not advising to use XHTML; I don't use it myself. I'm saying that, if a super-strict, no-void-elements parser is required, one already exists. Someone thinking about using XML syntaxt for HTML would need to consider the benefits/drawbacks for themselves. While I agree with the sentiment that "everything would be much simpler if there were no void elements", that ship has sailed for HTML (it left the dock about 30 years ago). -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/WICG/webcomponents/issues/624#issuecomment-1380376841 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <WICG/webcomponents/issues/624/1380376841@github.com>
Received on Thursday, 12 January 2023 13:44:34 UTC