- From: Daniel Appelquist <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 09:46:22 -0800
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 13 February 2023 17:46:34 UTC
Hi @domenic - Sorry for the mixed messages. Lea was asking specifically about the [new proposal](https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/721#issuecomment-1344814699) from @kjmcnee and I was referring to general updates of the original subject of the review. So yes, we would very much like to see a separate review opened when there is a new proposal. However the explainer link Kevin provided is to a document fragment, not to a [separate explainer doc](https://tag.w3.org/explainers/). Could you please clarify what we're being asked to review? To be clear: if it's a new piece of functionality that can be written up in an explainer doc, with the specific user needs being addressed, then please open up a new review (with a new explainer). If it's a delta to something we're already reviewing, then please update the current review text/explainer and let us know specifically what changed and why in a comment. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/721#issuecomment-1428390206 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/721/1428390206@github.com>
Received on Monday, 13 February 2023 17:46:34 UTC