Re: [whatwg/dom] MutationObserver GC section looks bogus (Issue #1159) from Anne van Kesteren on 2023-02-13 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from February 2023)

From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 08:52:08 -0800
To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <whatwg/dom/issues/1159/1428280491@github.com>

I guess you're right that they'll automatically disappear anyway. I don't have a lot of experience with weak references so I don't know if clearing them proactively like that is bad/who cares/good.

There's also #713 (and #720) about the global list of `MutationObserver` objects being wrong. https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/713#issuecomment-443606097 still seems like the correct solution for that.

I'll try to create a PR for this and then get everyone involved to date to review.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/1159#issuecomment-1428280491
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/dom/issues/1159/1428280491@github.com>

Received on Monday, 13 February 2023 16:52:20 UTC