Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Skip service worker no-op fetch handler (Issue #1671)

I'm happy with this proposal. There's an observable change in behaviour for cases where the fetch listener changes over time (eg with `Math.random()` or `Date.now()`), but these cases are somewhat unpredictable anyway, because it depends on the service worker terminating and starting up to pick up the new function.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1671#issuecomment-1428073318
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1671/1428073318@github.com>