Re: [whatwg/url] Refusing a mix of numeric-only and BIDI domains (#543)

The 163 label does not follow an RTL label, so while it violates the bidi rule for a label, it doesn't violate the domain name rule I proposed. I think I've said that several times too. Quoting RFC 5893 again:

   o  In a domain name consisting of only LDH labels (as defined in the
      Definitions document [RFC5890]) and labels that satisfy the rule,
      the requirements of Section 3 are satisfied as long as a label
      that starts with an ASCII digit does not come after a
      right-to-left label.

Satisfying the requirements of section 3 should be the goal of a domain name verification filter.




-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/url/issues/543#issuecomment-1420382748
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/url/issues/543/1420382748@github.com>

Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2023 08:30:42 UTC