- From: Marijn Kruisselbrink <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2023 08:40:58 -0800
- To: w3c/FileAPI <FileAPI@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 3 February 2023 16:41:10 UTC
I'm not sure what's wrong with being explicit when referencing definitions and referring to the other resolve as `[=/resolve=]`? The whole point of having "for" namespacing is so different specs can define the same terms without conflicts after all... -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/FileAPI/issues/190#issuecomment-1416119911 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3c/FileAPI/issues/190/1416119911@github.com>
Received on Friday, 3 February 2023 16:41:10 UTC