Re: [whatwg/webidl] Editorial: Refer to ECMA-262 as JavaScript rather than ECMAScript (PR #1379)

@jeremyroman commented on this pull request.



> @@ -6964,11 +6967,11 @@ to its caller, and so on.
 </div>
 
 
-<h3 id="es-environment">ECMAScript environment</h3>
+<h3 id="js-environment" oldids="es-environment">JavaScript environment</h3>

There's some history of using `oldids` (e.g., adding `es-undefined` and adding `es-void` as an old ID, when WebIDL renamed the concept of `void`). If the consensus is that we should continue to use `es-` for IDs then I can unwind that, though.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/webidl/pull/1379#discussion_r1437123285
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/webidl/pull/1379/review/1797313797@github.com>