Re: [whatwg/webidl] Editorial: Refer to ECMA-262 as JavaScript rather than ECMAScript (PR #1379)

@annevk approved this pull request.

Thanks for tackling this @jeremyroman!

> @@ -1533,7 +1535,7 @@ on which they appear.  It is language binding specific whether
         };
     </pre>
 
-    the constant value can be accessed in ECMAScript  either as
+    the constant value can be accessed in JavaScript  either as

```suggestion
    the constant value can be accessed in JavaScript either as
```

> @@ -6964,11 +6967,11 @@ to its caller, and so on.
 </div>
 
 
-<h3 id="es-environment">ECMAScript environment</h3>
+<h3 id="js-environment" oldids="es-environment">JavaScript environment</h3>

I think keeping the old IDs and not adding new IDs would be fine as well. I personally prefer that as it shows the document has some history.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/webidl/pull/1379#pullrequestreview-1792532677
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/webidl/pull/1379/review/1792532677@github.com>