- From: Amy Guy <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 09:08:06 -0800
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 20 December 2023 17:08:13 UTC
We're really happy to see this important use case being addressed. We have concerns about the design, and the additional complexity this brings to the mental model for sizing in CSS, but we understand that alternatives have been explored extensively by the WG. Can you please add alternatives considered, and reasons why those designs weren't chosen, to the explainer, so we have this on record for the future? Thanks! -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/890#issuecomment-1864837758 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/890/1864837758@github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 20 December 2023 17:08:13 UTC