- From: Alvin Ji <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 17:24:13 -0800
- To: w3c/pointerlock <pointerlock@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 20 December 2023 01:24:18 UTC
@alvinjiooo commented on this pull request. > + <li>[=Queue an element task=] on the [=user interaction task + source=], given this, to perform the following steps: + <ol> + <li>[=Fire an event=] named {{pointerlockerror}} at + [=this=]'s [=Node/node document=]. + </li> + <li>[=Reject=] <var>promise</var> with a + "{{InvalidStateError}}" {{DOMException}}. + </li> + </ol> + </li> + <li>Return <var>promise</var>. + </li> + </ol> + </li> + <li>If the user agent's [=pointer-lock target=]'s @james-howard provides a good use case of repeated requestPointerLock requests with different options. If that also sounds legit to you, may I mark this comment resolved? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/pointerlock/pull/49#discussion_r1432086985 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3c/pointerlock/pull/49/review/1789932894@github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 20 December 2023 01:24:18 UTC