Re: [whatwg/webidl] Editorial: Refer to ECMA-262 as JavaScript rather than ECMAScript (PR #1379)

@annevk @domenic PTAL? I'm hopeful that preserving most of the IDs as old IDs (or replicating the effect of `oldids` by using the same trick of adding empty spans, for cases where that's not supported by Bikeshed) will minimize the disruption to other specs.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/webidl/pull/1379#issuecomment-1863525703
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/webidl/pull/1379/c1863525703@github.com>

Received on Tuesday, 19 December 2023 21:55:10 UTC