- From: Evan Stade <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 10:42:50 -0800
- To: w3c/editing <editing@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 12 December 2023 18:42:55 UTC
Regarding the separate worklet: the issue here is that Excel keeps the data/model/business logic to process the data solely on the server. The "COGS" is _server_ CPU cycles plus bandwidth to send the data to the user's device (several pre-serialized copies, even). @snianu can correct me if I'm misunderstanding/misrepresenting this. It's not clear to me how many sites use this architecture so I agree that it's important to gather more feedback from a broader range of potential clients of this API, as @smaug---- suggests. Adobe did [weigh in](https://github.com/w3c/editing/issues/417#issuecomment-1464355663) but it seems that the details, such as limiting delayed rendering to built-in formats, limiting to 5 custom formats, a worklet, etc, may affect whether the API is still considered useful for Photoshop. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/editing/issues/439#issuecomment-1852608890 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3c/editing/issues/439/1852608890@github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 12 December 2023 18:42:55 UTC