Re: [w3c/push-api] Editorial: Introduce 'push subscription owner' concept (PR #367)

@martinthomson commented on this pull request.



> +          Future updates to this specification could expand the definition of a [=push subscription
+          owner=] to include other types, broadening the range of possible implementations.

I'd like to see that future update before adding another layer of indirection.  Do you have something more concrete to share?

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/push-api/pull/367#pullrequestreview-1774160245
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3c/push-api/pull/367/review/1774160245@github.com>