Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Specification review for fenced frames (Issue #838)

> Hi all. We are looking at this at our W3CTAG f2f. We had a long discussion about how the shape of this, changing the relationship between an iFrame and its embedding page — it must not be unique to the advertising use cases you've listed.
> 
> We brainstormed along the lines of a site presenting user-generated content in an iFrame, and the payments processes. Have you explored use cases out side the ones you're citing? And if so, what overlaps are you finding?

Totally agree that the idea of fenced frames is not unique to the use cases supported thus far. We are actively also working towards supporting the personalized payment button use case as is being discussed on this [issue](https://github.com/WICG/fenced-frame/issues/15) and mentioned in our earlier TAG review: [comment](https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/735#issuecomment-1159212677) and [support from the ecosystem](https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/735#issuecomment-1206075921).
We are hoping to update our explainer/spec as we make more progress on the design for the same.



-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/838#issuecomment-1667970369
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/838/1667970369@github.com>