- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 06:13:42 -0700
- To: whatwg/encoding <encoding@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 29 September 2022 13:13:54 UTC
Apologies for the slow follow-up here, maybe something like this for the description: > ... It therefore only superficially matches the GB18030-2005 standard for code points encoded as four bytes. **It complements index gb18030 described above.** See also ... I suppose we could add this step between step 8 and 9 to the gb18030 encoder but I'd like @hsivonen or @inexorabletash's input as to whether that seems okay: > Assert: _code point_ is the index gb18030 ranges code point for _pointer_. If we make these changes, would you like to be acknowledged as chncc? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/encoding/issues/258#issuecomment-1262262524 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <whatwg/encoding/issues/258/1262262524@github.com>
Received on Thursday, 29 September 2022 13:13:54 UTC