Re: [whatwg/dom] Disconnect single target instead of all (#126)

> That unobserve implementation loses all the queued records because of the disconnect() call. See https://dom.spec.whatwg.org/#dom-mutationobserver-disconnect step 2
> 
> Anyhow, [#126 (comment)](https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/126#issuecomment-916703706) is still a very valid comment here :)

It seems that the same behavior should apply then: drop the records and we're done. A `takeRecords()` call can precede that, if the end user so needs. 

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/126#issuecomment-1243039747
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/dom/issues/126/1243039747@github.com>