- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2022 18:28:14 -0700
- To: whatwg/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 8 September 2022 01:28:26 UTC
Yeah, I think that's a decision we just won't support on the web platform. It seems fine to not support undefined causes as distinct from absent causes. I gave this feedback back when the proposal was in TC39 and it was rejected. But for IDL and the web platform generally we'll use the web-platform-standard idioms of accessors on the prototype and undefined by default. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/webidl/pull/1179#issuecomment-1240112230 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <whatwg/webidl/pull/1179/c1240112230@github.com>
Received on Thursday, 8 September 2022 01:28:26 UTC