- From: Rik Cabanier <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 09:09:58 -0700
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 12 October 2022 16:10:10 UTC
Thanks for clarifying your position. It's strange that the TAG is ok throwing out such a fundamental part of the web. This will add an additional burden and restrictions on authors that want to use the model element for no real reason. > Minutes of our discussion [are here](https://github.com/w3ctag/meetings/blob/gh-pages/2022/telcons/10-10-minutes.md#on-model-tag-cors-requirement). That discussion doesn't match with what the <model> is trying to achieve. It also states that @annevk agreed that CORS was needed which isn't true. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/775#issuecomment-1276421087 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/775/1276421087@github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 12 October 2022 16:10:10 UTC