Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Update usages of module fetching html algorithms (PR #1658)

I checked the diff and found that there is one instance of "Asynchronously complete these steps" (in the clause "If maxScopeString is null or scopeString does not start with maxScopeString, then:") which is not replaced with "Invoke processCustomFetchResponse".

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1658#issuecomment-1267944256
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1658/c1267944256@github.com>

Received on Wednesday, 5 October 2022 05:02:03 UTC