Re: [w3c/permissions] Define a permission store (closes #384) (PR #390)

@johannhof commented on this pull request.



> @@ -278,6 +278,71 @@ <h3>
           reset because its [=permission/lifetime=] has expired.
         </p>
       </section>
+      <section>
+        <h3>
+          Permission Store
+        </h3>
+        <p>
+          The user agent maintains a single <dfn class="export">permission store</dfn> which is a [=/list=] of [=permission store entries=].

Hmm having tried this now I realize that using a map is a major change to the concepts we've been proposing in this PR as of now. It's a departure from saying e.g. "get a permission store entry" to something like "get the permission state for a permission store key", where the key would now be (description, key) and we might have to rename the latter key to something like "scope".

Overall I'm not a fan of that new map approach personally, and wanted to get thoughts on this change before writing it all up :)

Would you be comfortable with just using a set as an alternative to ensure this invariant?

(cc @annevk)

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/permissions/pull/390#discussion_r1035949702
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3c/permissions/pull/390/review/1199297363@github.com>