Re: [whatwg/url] javascript: URL parsing (#307)

@achristensen07 do you have thoughts on this? It seems WebKit might have inconsistent handling of `javascript:` URLs. E.g., on https://jsdom.github.io/whatwg-url/ `javascript://test:test` does not throw, but in `new URL()` it does. Contrast that with `test://test:test`.

@ricea I could see us making a distinct decision there (e.g., modifying "cannot have a username/password/port" to include the "`javascript`" scheme), so that's probably fair. But I think we need something stronger than "uncomfortable", especially if the parser does still allow for them to be included.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/url/issues/307#issuecomment-1332039076
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/url/issues/307/1332039076@github.com>