> I suppose it also could have been ChildrenPart. I guess the question there is whether the qualifying word describes the part’s own position or the nature of its possible content. If it’s the latter, ChildrenPart (or FragmentPart?) might be clearer, but if it’s the former, ChildPart does; it is the only “part” whose position is that of “a child node”. AttrPart (as opposed to, say, AttrValuePart) seems to be named consistently with ChildPart. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/WICG/webcomponents/issues/902#issuecomment-1331793833 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <WICG/webcomponents/issues/902/1331793833@github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 30 November 2022 08:23:12 UTC