Re: [w3c/permissions] Consider removing "lifetime" (Issue #391)

It's not clear to me what the value add is.

If a permission wanted to limit its lifetime or scope in some way it can define its own key. #390 adds infrastructure for this and "storage-access" will make use of it.

If a permission wants to make a recommendation (but not require) that a user agent limits its lifetime in some way it can recommend they use an implementation-defined key as will be allowed if we do the above.

If a lot of permissions end up doing that in a similar fashion it might make sense to add some kind of abstraction, but 1) lifetime isn't that and 2) this doesn't appear to be the case.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/permissions/issues/391#issuecomment-1330444093
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3c/permissions/issues/391/1330444093@github.com>