- From: Marcos Cáceres <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 19:35:55 -0800
- To: w3c/permissions <permissions@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 25 November 2022 03:36:09 UTC
I can't imagine any situation where the user would be prompted (i.e, UI is shown), but the user activation wouldn't be consumed (...but I may be lacking imagination, so someone enlighten me?). Thus, I think we should add these checks... It would require modifying the (or adding a new) algorithm to take a promise. The transient activation would be checked (potentially causing a promise rejection), user activation would be consumed, and the prompt would be shown. We could keep things backwards compatible by making the promise optional. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/permissions/issues/194#issuecomment-1326990073 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3c/permissions/issues/194/1326990073@github.com>
Received on Friday, 25 November 2022 03:36:09 UTC