- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 08:43:16 -0800
- To: whatwg/storage <storage@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <whatwg/storage/pull/152/review/1190425443@github.com>
@annevk commented on this pull request. It's unfortunate that preview doesn't work for these images. I guess that's due to it only doing a Bikeshed build and not a full build. @domenic can you do a quick peak? I'd love your thoughts on: 1. Doing models. 2. The Node.js stuff here. 3. Using `assets/` for structure. (Mainly because if this is good, we should adopt it elsewhere, e.g., in Fetch.) > @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@ /storage.spec.whatwg.org/ /deploy.sh /storage.html +/node_modules/ +package-lock.json This we'll also have to change upstream: https://github.com/whatwg/spec-factory/blob/main/factory.json. But it's straightforward enough. > +<figure> + <img src=assets/model-diagram.svg alt="Storage model diagram" aria-describedby=model-description +width=396 height=815> + <figcaption>A storage model diagram, described below.</figcaption> +</figure> This is what I had in mind: ```suggestion <p><img src=assets/model-diagram.svg alt="Storage model diagram (described in the next paragraph)." width=396 height=815> ``` I think what's currently proposed is rather unwieldy and would also result in a lot of duplication of content for AT users. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/storage/pull/152#pullrequestreview-1190425443 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <whatwg/storage/pull/152/review/1190425443@github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2022 16:43:28 UTC