- From: Daniel Appelquist <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 01:54:28 -0700
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 24 May 2022 08:54:40 UTC
Hi @JensenPaul - You've mentioned “PARAKEET” ... also Dovekey and some others. Some of these feel like competing approaches. It feels premature for TAG to offer a review when there are multiple competing proposals which are all seen as experiments. Has the group decided - is there group consensus to use this as a winning proposal? It feels like group consensus should come first. What does the path to consensus look like? Is it running multiple proposals in the field and getting data and then bringing this data back into the process? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/723#issuecomment-1135593662 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/723/1135593662@github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 24 May 2022 08:54:40 UTC