[w3ctag/design-reviews] Early design review: Back/forward cache NotRestoredReasons API (Issue #739)

Braw mornin' TAG!

I'm requesting a TAG review of Back/forward cache NotRestoredReasons API.

  - Explainer¹ (minimally containing user needs and example code): [url](https://github.com/rubberyuzu/bfcache-not-retored-reason/blob/main/NotRestoredReason.md)
  - User research: N/A
  - Security and Privacy self-review²: [url](https://github.com/rubberyuzu/bfcache-not-retored-reason/blob/main/NotRestoredReason.md#self-review-questionnaire-security-and-privacy)
  - GitHub repo (if you prefer feedback filed there): [[url](https://github.com/rubberyuzu/bfcache-not-retored-reason)]
  - Primary contacts (and their relationship to the specification):
      - Yuzu Saijo ([rubberyuzu]), [Google, Chromium] 
  - Organization/project driving the design:  Google (BFCache team)
  - External status/issue trackers for this feature (publicly visible, e.g. Chrome Status): [Chrome status](https://chromestatus.com/feature/5684908759449600)

Further details:

  - [✓] I have reviewed the TAG's [Web Platform Design Principles](https://www.w3.org/TR/design-principles/)
  - The group where the incubation/design work on this is being done (or is intended to be done in the future): The explainer will stay in personal repo.
  - The group where standardization of this work is intended to be done ("unknown" if not known): WHATWG
  - Existing major pieces of multi-stakeholder review or discussion of this design:[Navigation Timing API GitHub issue](https://github.com/w3c/navigation-timing/issues/171#issuecomment-1062672989)
  - Major unresolved issues with or opposition to this design: [Avoid browser specific reasons](https://github.com/rubberyuzu/bfcache-not-retored-reason/issues/2#issuecomment-1084015788)
  - This work is being funded by: Google

We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as :
🐛 open issues in our GitHub repo for each point of feedback

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/739

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/739@github.com>