- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 04 May 2022 12:22:41 -0700
- To: whatwg/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 4 May 2022 19:22:53 UTC
It seems the intention was to allow that, per > [undefined](https://webidl.spec.whatwg.org/#idl-undefined) constant values in IDL are represented with the undefined token. Probably we should just make undefined a primitive type? It's certainly a primitive type in JavaScript, and I'm not sure why we'd depart. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/webidl/pull/1140#issuecomment-1117732388 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <whatwg/webidl/pull/1140/c1117732388@github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 4 May 2022 19:22:53 UTC