Re: [whatwg/webidl] ObservableArray types in namespace (#1000)

I think `a.b = c` defining a `"b"` property on `a` would be more-expected than if it defined a new `"b"` property on `d`, an object somewhere in `a`’s prototype chain, especially if they report themselves as data properties.

I have no reason to think folks are going to be invoking AO’s [[Set]] with receivers other than the AOs themselves (other than me, apparently) but didn’t think this would bear on which argument is the assignee (usually literally the LHS of an assignment expression).

> I was hoping for some example of reasonable code developers might write

Hear this a lot yeah 🥲

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/webidl/issues/1000#issuecomment-1116850144

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/webidl/issues/1000/1116850144@github.com>