- From: Benedikt Jenik <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2022 20:11:19 -0800
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <whatwg/dom/issues/1064/1061386191@github.com>
@bathos I understand that my request is a bit out there and one would need to carefully consider security implications, specifically for `<script>` maybe less so for `<style>`. I also understand that because my request is relatively obscure, while at the same time being costly, it may not get a high priority or even make the bar of "we should do this". The question basically comes down to if the spec is more of a goalpost that one would want to push forward (my direction not necessarily being the first priority obviously) or if it is more of a minimal subset of things that different browser vendors agree on being necessary. I assume you can judge that much better than I could. @WebReflection maybe I'm missing or misunderstanding something, but my goal is to affect what the element renders as - and from all the documentation I could find, that is still done with shadow dom for custom elements like so: ```js constructor() { super(); shadow = this.attachShadow({mode: 'open'}); } ``` which still seems to fail for the same reason. Let me know if I overlooked something. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/1064#issuecomment-1061386191 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <whatwg/dom/issues/1064/1061386191@github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 8 March 2022 04:11:31 UTC