- From: alancutter <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2022 00:23:39 -0800
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/683/1057793444@github.com>
Sorry about the radio silence, I was temporarily fighting fires on a different project but can now dedicate my time back on this one. > It is a bit confusing that the repo's main readme [1] doesn't mention this explainer or what is the current proposal being pursued, as well as what is not being pursued any longer > > [1] https://github.com/WICG/sw-launch/blob/main/README.md It was very out of date indeed, [updated](https://github.com/WICG/sw-launch/blob/main/README.md). > The explainer starts out with this line: > > > Authors: alancutter@, mgiuca@, dominickn@ Last updated: 2021-07-09 > > I don't know if you put the at signs at the wrong end of your GitHub usernames or what, but it looks pretty weird. > The explainer is written in a way that assumes the reader has a lot more context than is necessarily the case. I think it would be useful to rewrite the explainer taking into account our advice in the [Explainer explainer](https://tag.w3.org/explainers/). > Hi @alancutter , we had a discussion in this week's TAG meeting and have the following comments: > > 1. It would be good to rewrite the explainer, for example, adding more use cases from the end-user need perspective, you can refer the tips in: https://tag.w3.org/explainers/ Adding fix ups and extra use case paragraphs to the overview. https://github.com/WICG/sw-launch/pull/50 > 2. This proposal may also related to [MiniApp lifecycle](https://www.w3.org/TR/miniapp-lifecycle/), it is better to be aligned or reusable as much as possible. Probably @QingAn can also have a look on this together. Filed https://github.com/WICG/sw-launch/issues/52 to dig into this. It looks quite hairy, I'll need some assistance in understanding the differences between web apps and MiniApps when it comes to launching and window instances. > When a client is being navigated, will this mean that a new entry is added to the session history so that you can get back to earlier state? (like right click on titlebar and click 'back') > > Maybe we could even get rid of `"existing-client"` given that a site can always add a consumer and manually navigate? This is a heavy feedback item that I filed https://github.com/WICG/sw-launch/issues/47 to dig into, please respond to the follow up discussion in that thread. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/683#issuecomment-1057793444 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/683/1057793444@github.com>
Received on Thursday, 3 March 2022 08:23:52 UTC