Re: [w3c/touch-events] Require non-cancelable events with "should" or "must" when there are only passive listeners (Issue #130)

i believe some of the cautious language (should and may, rather than must) was a result of the history of this spec (and the fact that further development is only a CG draft report), which more of less retrospectively documented behavior done by Webkit (couple with the fact that there was initially a bit of a PAG saber-rattling over the original 1.0 spec itself).

happy to go over the spec and make it more forceful where necessary.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/touch-events/issues/130#issuecomment-1169707950
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3c/touch-events/issues/130/1169707950@github.com>